Skip to main content

WHY I AM NOT ATTENDING THE PEACE CONFERENCES

           Let us be realistic and not just face the lies of our realities. We are living in a highly volatile world, very wild indeed. It is true that Kenya needs peace and she needs it now, especially this time when we are headed for elections. As we lead and attend these workshops and conferences, the questions we fail to answer are: What is the cause of all these unrests we experience during the elections? How, in our very own way, have we tried to address the causes of upheavals in this country? Are we really serious that we yearn for peace? Are we in a state of peaceful coexistence before we scream for peace in other circles? How then are we going to call for peace and yet we are stepping on our brother’s toe?
               These fundamental questions have no answers in my own point of view. Why?  Because we are not yet ready to answer them. Those of us who talk about peace in this country are either hypocritical or do not have an idea of how to squeeze money out of the taxpayers and dip them  into doing something that can be looked as fruitful. We do not just need peace in this country, we need understanding. We need to loosen up our grip on the illusion that we know yet we do not know. We need to, for once, sit on our mouths and open our ears and listen to the voices of the downtrodden.
                    When we go around speaking about peace we sound outrageous, uneducated and unreasonable. Talking about tranquility means addressing all those injustices that were committed; and reaching a state of compromise. Kenya has a bulwark of injustices that have never been fully addressed. A good example is the post election violence, where IDPs are still languishing in the camps with intolerable conditions. Well, even if it were me, if someone came to me calling for peace, I would be the first to cast the first stone.
               Why then Am I not attending these peace ‘things’?  Essentially, it is useless for me to yawn through a meeting that has more talk than nothing for hours listening to that humdrum talk about peace. I would rather stay in my garden, tilling and listening to the peaceful song of the birds. One thing that you notice when attending such functions is that awkwardness among the speakers, especially if they are drawn from the political class. You see the wine glass in hand while they are dishing out water. You see the mask hiding the devil within since these devil forgot that the mask does not cover the eyes!
             As for those other individuals, who are not politicians, you see the wringing of hands in their voice since they do not know what they are talking about. There is some kind of mischievous fallacy being played before us in the guise of preaching peace.
               The attendants on the other hands are always a total comedy. Some of them maybe attended because of the excitement of seeing a certain celebrity. Others maybe attended because they expected some handouts. And still others came to pass time. The best group is that of those who came because they wanted to see what is really going on, ‘the out of curiosity group’.  With such an audience, goats would do better.
              Secondly, I believe in the notion that, peace cannot be achieved on an expectant and hungry stomach. Picture this, you have a dog that is hungry and is creating so much fuss, you go out there peeling the last bits of meat on the bone and talking calmly to the dog, “come down boy, come down.” Am not sure if you will survive the onslaught. The point I am trying to make is this, instead of wasting money on mundane projects like peace initiatives, let us come up with projects that could generate some activity on the idle minds. Kenya has enterprising and innovative citizens. If only these citizens’ products could find a market, a mentor and capital I don’t think there would be energy to raise a finger. Why then don’t we redirect ourselves to those potentials instead of singing the same song of peace? Talking about peace is like massaging an area that was pricked with a thorn and not removing the thorn itself. Ouch!
             My third reason is, in reference to the blog I ran earlier, LET KENYANS WIELD THE JEMBE, RECONCILIATION IS A BOARDROOM TALK, (http://mwashy.blogspot.com/2012/03/let-kenyans-wield-jembe-reconciliation.html) I don’t think Kenyans on the ground are disunited. Walk to Nairobi’s slums and you would be shocked at the peace that prevails from a neighbour upon neighbour. You would not even believe that this neighbour will turn against his neighbour with a rungu and machete. For this neighbour to get on the neck of his neighbour there must be something venomous, since, this is the neighbour he/she has been rushing to with a bowl to borrow flour, beg for salt even ask for a favour of looking after the kids. Now, the venom  that causes such animosity is fuelled from years of neglect, bitterness and bad leadership that stems from the tribe which is dear to a Kenyan, even the foreign born. One thing that I have never come to understand is how deep the village was planted in us. It is like that thorny tree that has grown close to our hearts that any pull or push causes untold pain.
                 Frankly speaking, it is the leaders we need to preach peace to. That is my honest opinion, we need to sit our leaders down, tear their vices in their own faces and point blankly tell them that we are not pleased with their stepping on our toes with stilettos and pointing innocently to our neighbour forcing us to slap the innocent and let the real culprit go free.
                      I will attend the next peace conference only when we shall be ready to listen to and address the grievances of the people or when we shall sit down our leaders and preach to them peace or maybe when we shall remove our sheep skins and show case our wolfish behaviour ready to confess that we are changing for the better. Call me to that meeting and I will gladly attend.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW FEMINISM IS ADDRESSED IN THE RIVER AND THE SOURCE

The story revolves around Akoko. The buck stops with women in the fight against oppressive testosterone. It is upon women to tap into their innermost strength to transform the world it what they imagined. Akoko, being on the losing end in a male-dominated family fought her way to earn her father’s love. She had to put her feet on the ground to make the world recognize her. Aloo, the family spokesman said that Akoko’s hard work had been incorporated into a saying that women sending their children on errands would mention her. She did not show any female shyness when she was introduced to her husband to be. With her head held high, Akoko stirred into Owuor Kembo a feeling that had not earned vocabulary among the Luo - love. Akoko did not subject the chief to monogamy. She was okay with him marrying as many women as her wealth could manage. It was the chief’s decision, despite growing outcry, to remain faithful to his wife. We are not told of any arm-twisting but sure as the sun ris...

EXPLORING FEMINISM IN BLOSSOMS OF THE SAVANNAH AND A DOLL'S HOUSE

Feminism emerged as a movement to fight for the social, political and economic rights of the women. It is more of a political movement that recognises the individuality and sexuality of women and how historically and religion wise have been segregated. Before the advent of feminism, women lived under the tutelage of their male counterparts. For instance, a woman did not have any right to choose whom to marry, it was the prerogative of the male family member to choose. In the TV Serial, Rome, Julius 'Octavian' Caesar, who later became Augustus Caesar, makes a decision that affects both his mother and sister in a way unimaginable. The mother, Artia of the Julii is in love with Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony) and she plans to marry him. However, Caesar decides it will be impossible for the two lovebirds to make it official. For political reasons, he settles for his sister Octavia as a suitable wife for Mark Anthony! There are many examples of male subjugation in numerous cultu...

THEME OF MARRIAGE IN A DOLL'S HOUSE

Henrik Ibsen explores marriage as a tool for women subjugation and at the same time as a weapon of financial emancipation. He also looks at marriage as a level-headed arrangement between two like-minded individuals. Marriage is one of the most celebrated unions in the world. Similarly, it enjoys such high moral ground in religious and many cultural circles. In A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen explores this vital part of the society in the life and times of Nora, her husband Torvald Helmer and other characters. From the onset, marriage seems a happy association since Nora is jubilant and bubbly as a wife. Although money could be one of the factors that threaten this marriage, Nora is capable of handling it. Torvald is very particular about the family’s expenditure and warns Nora to be careful. Being naïve and playing innocence helps Norah to get away with her husband’s restraint. In their association, Helmer holds the high moral ground, chief financier and key decision-maker. He ...