Skip to main content

BONFACE MWANGI DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE TRICKS OF STREET PROTEST



Boniface Mwangi decided to call it quits on being a civil rights activist. Congratulations to him. I wish him a very happy life with the family. Activism is not bread and butter as many Kenyans think. It is live bullets and teargas laced with clubbing. It leaves you hungry in an angry way.
Frankly, every Kenyan would love to be on the streets today. They would love to sing and chant anti-Govt and Pro-Govt songs in equal measure. They would love to correct the rot in society but, they dare not. Why don’t they?
Key among very many reasons is, Kenyans do not recognize leadership. I will swear that, there are very many Kenyans who do not know there deputy governors. I will also be confident to see any county resident name for me the members of the county cabinet. Rising up the ladder, the cabinet secretaries and cabinet meetings have become traditional stories. Who then rules Kenyans?
A Kenyan is governed by the boss at work. This is the person who sets the rules and governs their implementation. He gives orders and directives as the busy Kenyans rummages around to find opportunities to steal. Secondly, a Kenyan is governed by the money they earn from their hard sweat at work. What has made Kenyans reluctant to protest is the fact that. They have ached a way of living without government. They acknowledge its existence but have never expected anything good to come from it. Do Kenyans know the role of government?
No.
How then will they protest?
In his quest to fight for the rights of Kenyans, Boniface forgot four cardinal rules: one, charisma. Secondly, he forgot leadership. Thirdly he avoided motivation. Lastly he abhorred his mentors. While doing all this, he threw away purpose and sense of commitment until it is done.
In his zeal to bring the leadership to proactive responsibility Mr. Mwangi forgot to involve the country. He increasingly wanted to be the voice of the unheard without letting the unheard make themselves be heard.
Martin Luther became successful in activism because he stood for the course which he elevated. He was speaking against racism. He became racism and took the persona of Racism wherever he went. He did not take to streets, he opened the streets for the protesters. He spoke from a little church which charged him to fiercely rise above a simple pastor into a national figure. How did he do it? He used up his words to grow confidence in the people who so felt the oppression that they so wanted gone. He had the courage to defiantly rise above the din and have his dream. He used his voice, he used his audience and he knew well how to do it.
Mandela on the other hand made south Africans to believe him. He made them know that he was trusted and he alone was capable of delivering them. He was on point and he was fearless.
Two of the most significant activists in Kenya are the late Wangari Maathai and Okiya Omtata. Boniface need to ask himself the following questions; What did they have that I do not? Secondly, what were they fighting for?
After answering these questions, he should then ask, ‘What Am I fighting for?’ He cannot fight for everything.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW FEMINISM IS ADDRESSED IN THE RIVER AND THE SOURCE

The story revolves around Akoko. The buck stops with women in the fight against oppressive testosterone. It is upon women to tap into their innermost strength to transform the world it what they imagined. Akoko, being on the losing end in a male-dominated family fought her way to earn her father’s love. She had to put her feet on the ground to make the world recognize her. Aloo, the family spokesman said that Akoko’s hard work had been incorporated into a saying that women sending their children on errands would mention her. She did not show any female shyness when she was introduced to her husband to be. With her head held high, Akoko stirred into Owuor Kembo a feeling that had not earned vocabulary among the Luo - love. Akoko did not subject the chief to monogamy. She was okay with him marrying as many women as her wealth could manage. It was the chief’s decision, despite growing outcry, to remain faithful to his wife. We are not told of any arm-twisting but sure as the sun ris...
2 comments
Read more

EXPLORING FEMINISM IN BLOSSOMS OF THE SAVANNAH AND A DOLL'S HOUSE

Feminism emerged as a movement to fight for the social, political and economic rights of the women. It is more of a political movement that recognises the individuality and sexuality of women and how historically and religion wise have been segregated. Before the advent of feminism, women lived under the tutelage of their male counterparts. For instance, a woman did not have any right to choose whom to marry, it was the prerogative of the male family member to choose. In the TV Serial, Rome, Julius 'Octavian' Caesar, who later became Augustus Caesar, makes a decision that affects both his mother and sister in a way unimaginable. The mother, Artia of the Julii is in love with Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony) and she plans to marry him. However, Caesar decides it will be impossible for the two lovebirds to make it official. For political reasons, he settles for his sister Octavia as a suitable wife for Mark Anthony! There are many examples of male subjugation in numerous cultu...
5 comments
Read more

THEME OF MARRIAGE IN A DOLL'S HOUSE

Henrik Ibsen explores marriage as a tool for women subjugation and at the same time as a weapon of financial emancipation. He also looks at marriage as a level-headed arrangement between two like-minded individuals. Marriage is one of the most celebrated unions in the world. Similarly, it enjoys such high moral ground in religious and many cultural circles. In A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen explores this vital part of the society in the life and times of Nora, her husband Torvald Helmer and other characters. From the onset, marriage seems a happy association since Nora is jubilant and bubbly as a wife. Although money could be one of the factors that threaten this marriage, Nora is capable of handling it. Torvald is very particular about the family’s expenditure and warns Nora to be careful. Being naïve and playing innocence helps Norah to get away with her husband’s restraint. In their association, Helmer holds the high moral ground, chief financier and key decision-maker. He ...
1 comment
Read more