Skip to main content

BREAKING NORM COULD BE FATAL

Azdak, despite his Solomonic Wisdom, has some disgraceful traits. Write an essay in support of the statement basing your illustrations on Bertolt Brecht’s The Caucasian Chalk Circle

The elevation of Azdak to judge’s seat was somehow dramatic. The Ironshirts who had just met him considered his mannerism as uncouth and bold; “The judge was always a rascal! Now a rascal shall be a judge!” (pg74) As a judge, Azdak proved to be a rascal indeed, he blatantly and arrogantly dispensed with the book of statutes hence becoming the law. In his tenure as a judge, though dishonorable, he was considered to have brought in a “golden age of justice, however short.
As a judge, Azdak would openly receive a bribe, “I accept” extending his hand to both the accused and the prosecution. To Azdak, bribery was official business- “Good now the formalities are disposed of,” he would say as he pocketed the spoils. (pg78) His arrogance and greed blinded him to the numerous witnesses available. But, bribery did not influence him in passing judgment for in most occasions, the winners would be the victims and not the accuses. For example, the Innkeeper who bribed Azdak after suing the stableman in the claims of rape lost his beloved roan to the court.
 Azdak was also abusive. He insulted Shauwa and called him a man-eater. He further called the people gathered in court dogs. Despite his sharp tongue, he has a quick wit and an intellectual brilliance about him. He sings about the war in Persia and also accepts Simon Shashava’s proverb challenges. However, when Simon says, “A fart has no nose, he penalizes him for contempt of court.
When we come across the character of Azdak, he is helping a beggar. He, in fact, takes him to his house and gives him some food. Thereafter, when he learns that the beggar was indeed the Grand Duke (Grand swindler) himself, Azdak like a law-abiding citizen is ready to confess his sins. He commands Shauwa to detain him and take him to court. However, the same Azdak who obeys the law becomes the man who sits on the statute book and dispenses law according to his will. He literally dishonours the law was supposed to uphold. Furthermore, he drinks wine while in court and shows off his torn pants standing on the table.
Although Azdak displays cavalier mannerism, and uncouth behavior, he still stands out as the best judge Grusinia ever had. He represents common sense and humane mannerism. He is the guy who saw the pain of the old lady he called “Granny Grusinia” and passed an edict that made the farmers realise their essence in helping the old in society. However, breaking of the traditions and dictates of the society does not elevate Azdak to a level of sainthood. No wonder he disappears from Grusinia before the law caught up with him. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW FEMINISM IS ADDRESSED IN THE RIVER AND THE SOURCE

The story revolves around Akoko. The buck stops with women in the fight against oppressive testosterone. It is upon women to tap into their innermost strength to transform the world it what they imagined. Akoko, being on the losing end in a male-dominated family fought her way to earn her father’s love. She had to put her feet on the ground to make the world recognize her. Aloo, the family spokesman said that Akoko’s hard work had been incorporated into a saying that women sending their children on errands would mention her. She did not show any female shyness when she was introduced to her husband to be. With her head held high, Akoko stirred into Owuor Kembo a feeling that had not earned vocabulary among the Luo - love. Akoko did not subject the chief to monogamy. She was okay with him marrying as many women as her wealth could manage. It was the chief’s decision, despite growing outcry, to remain faithful to his wife. We are not told of any arm-twisting but sure as the sun ris

THEME OF MARRIAGE IN A DOLL'S HOUSE

Henrik Ibsen explores marriage as a tool for women subjugation and at the same time as a weapon of financial emancipation. He also looks at marriage as a level-headed arrangement between two like-minded individuals. Marriage is one of the most celebrated unions in the world. Similarly, it enjoys such high moral ground in religious and many cultural circles. In A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen explores this vital part of the society in the life and times of Nora, her husband Torvald Helmer and other characters. From the onset, marriage seems a happy association since Nora is jubilant and bubbly as a wife. Although money could be one of the factors that threaten this marriage, Nora is capable of handling it. Torvald is very particular about the family’s expenditure and warns Nora to be careful. Being naïve and playing innocence helps Norah to get away with her husband’s restraint. In their association, Helmer holds the high moral ground, chief financier and key decision-maker. He

EXPLORING FEMINISM IN BLOSSOMS OF THE SAVANNAH AND A DOLL'S HOUSE

Feminism emerged as a movement to fight for the social, political and economic rights of the women. It is more of a political movement that recognises the individuality and sexuality of women and how historically and religion wise have been segregated. Before the advent of feminism, women lived under the tutelage of their male counterparts. For instance, a woman did not have any right to choose whom to marry, it was the prerogative of the male family member to choose. In the TV Serial, Rome, Julius 'Octavian' Caesar, who later became Augustus Caesar, makes a decision that affects both his mother and sister in a way unimaginable. The mother, Artia of the Julii is in love with Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony) and she plans to marry him. However, Caesar decides it will be impossible for the two lovebirds to make it official. For political reasons, he settles for his sister Octavia as a suitable wife for Mark Anthony! There are many examples of male subjugation in numerous cultur