Skip to main content

PESSIMISM IN JOHN STEINBECK'S THE PEARL

Steinbeck speaks about the impossibility of making it in a highly polarised world where class defines individual standards of living. 

Every author has their own perspective of the society expressed in their work of art. Some writers have chosen to retain the status quo which is the bedrock of the society even today. Hard as it may be to believe, society is defined by its hierarchical order, which is disturbed like in The Caucasian Chalk Circle by Bertolt Brecht brings around chaos where the weak and poor enjoy a certain form of justice. Bertolt Brecht uses anarchy to bring a semblance of Justice in Grusinia where an arrogant judge- Azdak dispenses justice to the weak and punishes the corrupt and reach. This lasts for a short while before normalcy is returned.
The book the Great Expectations and Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables somehow border on the pessimist side of the society. However, it is Steinbeck who puts into context the pessimistic view of the society.
The pessimism in Steinbeck’s work speaks about how an individual of modest means can break the status quo to enjoy the good fortunes society has given. When Kino finds the pearl, his hopes and dreams amplify into the luxuries that such a find can give. However, his dreams are shattered when he realizes that the constructs of the society are so rigid that he cannot break loose from the shackles that bind him to poverty.
The pessimism also speaks about the Swahili proverb: “Kidole kimoja hakivunji Chawa” (a finger cannot kill a louse) by showing that Kino and his family could not have managed to fight the forces of ‘evil’ that bound them to misery. Condemning religion as a tool of subjugation, Steinbeck shows how the people of brush houses have been reduced into submission by the church in that anything out of the norm is viewed as evil- a condition that spirals Kino into a lone world of self-defense that results to the death of his son Coyotito.
Although Kino is seen as a man determined to break the control of the city of stone over his people, he seems overpowered. The rage within that drives Kino is quenched by his conscience. At the beginning we see a Kino who would rather kill the members of the walled town than ask for their assistance, but as the book ends, yes, the anger is still there, but the resolve to continue fighting died with his son.
The son, Coyotito seem to represent the courage and optimism of Kino and his people, “My son will go to school.” (Pg46)- An institution which represented hope and a future free from oppression. Kino believed that if his son could read, he could understand all the mysteries of education his children had been denied. And if they could understand, they could have a better future. The death of a son, therefore, symbolizes the death of hope and a perceived oppression-free future.

In The Pearl, Steinbeck captures the despair of many who have tried to fight against different barriers of oppression. Although some have succeeded, their success is usually individual with the award of multimillion Nobel Peace Prize among others which oft makes them forget about the plight of those they stood to fight for while they join the league of those in the city of stone.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW FEMINISM IS ADDRESSED IN THE RIVER AND THE SOURCE

The story revolves around Akoko. The buck stops with women in the fight against oppressive testosterone. It is upon women to tap into their innermost strength to transform the world it what they imagined. Akoko, being on the losing end in a male-dominated family fought her way to earn her father’s love. She had to put her feet on the ground to make the world recognize her. Aloo, the family spokesman said that Akoko’s hard work had been incorporated into a saying that women sending their children on errands would mention her. She did not show any female shyness when she was introduced to her husband to be. With her head held high, Akoko stirred into Owuor Kembo a feeling that had not earned vocabulary among the Luo - love. Akoko did not subject the chief to monogamy. She was okay with him marrying as many women as her wealth could manage. It was the chief’s decision, despite growing outcry, to remain faithful to his wife. We are not told of any arm-twisting but sure as the sun ris...
2 comments
Read more

EXPLORING FEMINISM IN BLOSSOMS OF THE SAVANNAH AND A DOLL'S HOUSE

Feminism emerged as a movement to fight for the social, political and economic rights of the women. It is more of a political movement that recognises the individuality and sexuality of women and how historically and religion wise have been segregated. Before the advent of feminism, women lived under the tutelage of their male counterparts. For instance, a woman did not have any right to choose whom to marry, it was the prerogative of the male family member to choose. In the TV Serial, Rome, Julius 'Octavian' Caesar, who later became Augustus Caesar, makes a decision that affects both his mother and sister in a way unimaginable. The mother, Artia of the Julii is in love with Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony) and she plans to marry him. However, Caesar decides it will be impossible for the two lovebirds to make it official. For political reasons, he settles for his sister Octavia as a suitable wife for Mark Anthony! There are many examples of male subjugation in numerous cultu...
5 comments
Read more

THEME OF MARRIAGE IN A DOLL'S HOUSE

Henrik Ibsen explores marriage as a tool for women subjugation and at the same time as a weapon of financial emancipation. He also looks at marriage as a level-headed arrangement between two like-minded individuals. Marriage is one of the most celebrated unions in the world. Similarly, it enjoys such high moral ground in religious and many cultural circles. In A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen explores this vital part of the society in the life and times of Nora, her husband Torvald Helmer and other characters. From the onset, marriage seems a happy association since Nora is jubilant and bubbly as a wife. Although money could be one of the factors that threaten this marriage, Nora is capable of handling it. Torvald is very particular about the family’s expenditure and warns Nora to be careful. Being naïve and playing innocence helps Norah to get away with her husband’s restraint. In their association, Helmer holds the high moral ground, chief financier and key decision-maker. He ...
1 comment
Read more